Connect with us

WTA Tour

Indian Wells Pressure Series — Garbine Muguruza

Matt Zemek

Published

on

Geoff Burke -- USA TODAY Sports

Garbine Muguruza isn’t helping herself, but she helped Tennis With An Accent. Confused? Here’s the explanation on a February Wednesday.

For this “Indian Wells Pressure Series” at Tennis With An Accent, I weighed whether to write a piece on Angelique Kerber, who lost Wednesday in Dubai to Hsieh Su-Wei. Kerber could really use a big run in Indian Wells (or Miami) to shore up her season, but after a Doha semifinal, is a Dubai flameout that big a cause for concern? I’m not sure. This isn’t 2017 for Kerber. She is playing a lot better than she did in that annus horribilis.

Yet, tennis writing — and more precisely, running a tennis website — demands constant content to keep Google News indexes happy. That is a part of the business I have learned to accept over time. I could have provided a short piece saying Kerber’s loss to Hsieh wasn’t too much of a reason to be concerned. However, that’s not a sexy story. I waited to see if another juicier story would emerge.

Muchisimas Gracias, Garbine Muguruza.

I am not happy that she lost, but this is a more interesting story to write — I cannot hide from that claim.

Ed Salmon, whose succinct summaries often express everything one needs to know about a match in a single literary stroke, offered this essential summary of Muguruza’s lopsided loss to Elina Svitolina:

Saqib Ali has had Ed on our TWAA Podcast. Saqib has also invited Tumaini Carayol onto his show, and Tumaini made this perceptive observation after Muguruza’s misery deepened in Dubai:

The notion that Muguruza carries pressure into Indian Wells might ring hollow for some. Muguruza’s year is based on doing well at Roland Garros first, then Wimbledon. However, part of the point here is that Muguruza should be a better hardcourt player. She should thrive on any surface. She has the game made for it — if that game can ever be unlocked, and her talent can reemerge.

If Muguruza does nothing in Indian Wells or Miami, she will have nothing to rely on, nothing to trust, heading into clay season. She could flip the switch again, as she has done in the past, but a player with her talent — her high ceiling when everything is going well — should not settle for being good at a small number of tournaments per year.

Relative to Tumaini Carayol’s point about the relationship with coach Sam Sumyk, Indian Wells (and Miami) should become a time where Muguruza either regains trust in this partnership, or decides to cut the cord before clay season and seek a new voice. That’s the value of Indian Wells and the March Premier Mandatory swing in the United States: Either Muguruza gains fresh reason to buy what Sumyk is selling, or she goes on the market in search of a new coach.

Matt Zemek is the co-editor of Tennis With An Accent with Saqib Ali. Matt is the lead writer for the site and helps Saqib with the TWAA podcast, produced by Radio Influence at radioinfluence.com. Matt has written professionally about men's and women's tennis since 2014 for multiple outlets: Comeback Media, FanRagSports, and independently at Patreon, where he maintains a tennis site. You can reach Matt by e-mail: mzemek@hotmail.com. You can find him on Twitter at @mzemek.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Advertisement

Trending