The WTA’s love affair with China is not an innocent love affair. It is — like most love affairs which are morally wrong — hurting other people. Hyperbole? No… but if you’re unsure, I’ll explain.
The WTA Elite Zhuhai tournament just concluded. I actually like the idea of having a second year-end tournament for the players who missed Shenzhen and the WTA Finals. Why not give more tennis players a chance to earn money (emphasis on money, not rankings points) and build confidence for next season?
What isn’t good: rewarding players at this second-tier year-end event more than the players who earned a berth in the WTA Finals.
Yet, the WTA Elite Zhuhai event does exactly that.
Players who make the WTA Finals in Shenzhen but lose all three round-robin matches still get generously compensated in money for each match. Spreading more money to more players in Zhuhai is perfectly fine.
This is not about money. This is about rankings points, which reflect the quality of the work done by a player throughout a season. These points can and do affect the seedings — and therefore, the draws — for big tournaments such as the Australian Open, which is the next big tournament any of these WTA players will play.
So, tell me how it is fair to give the Zhuhai participants a shot at 700 rankings points? That is what Aryna Sabalenka earned for winning all four matches in Zhuhai: two round-robin matches, a semifinal, and a final. Had Kiki Bertens — also 3-0 in Zhuhai entering the final — won, she would have claimed the 700-point haul.
We have seen three players at the WTA Finals already need medical attention during their first round-robin matches: Belinda Bencic, Bianca Andreescu, and Simona Halep. They are all being asked to play elite players. Bencic in particular has to face Petra Kvitova and then Naomi Osaka.
The tough draw at the eight-player, year-end championship event makes it very realistic that a player will go 0-3 and not get a rankings points boost.
Sabalenka and Bertens, both top-four seeds at the 12-player Zhuhai event, played a far weaker level of competition and made significant points gains, with Sabalenka gaining the full 700-point prize.
How significant is a 700-point haul on the WTA Tour?
A 700-point prize is more points than a Premier Mandatory runner-up finish. It is almost as many points as a major semifinal.
In no rational universe should a SECOND-TIER tournament confer such a points banquet on the champion.
Zhuhai should be given a smaller amount of points than a Premier — more than an International is fair enough, but not on the same plane as a Premier tournament.
Give Zhuhai players generous amounts of money, but points? That is unfair to the WTA Finals participants who lose ground in points and watched their seedings suffer at the 2020 Australian Open.
Tennis remains dumb. That is the theme for the day — or is it the week, or month, or year, or decade, or century?
All of the above? Oui. #OuiTweets
Follow @saqiba’s Tennis With An Accent Podcast. Listen to Saqib Ali’s show at our five main outlets:
RedCircle is here.
Stitcher is here.
Google Podcasts is here.
Radio Public is here.
Apple Podcasts is here — subscribe, rate and review.
It takes just five minutes and helps our placement on search pages, which gives us a better chance of being noticed by advertisers who might sponsor our podcast and help us remain in business on a long-term basis.
We will be here covering tennis in 2020, but our long-term future depends on a long-term sponsorship which will provide a long-term revenue source.
If you want to support Tennis With An Accent in the short term, in appreciation for the year-round writing and podcasting produced by this site, go here.
- WTA Tour1 week ago
Another awful unforced error in tennis scheduling
- WTA Tour6 days ago
Sabalenka defeats two opponents in complicated Madrid WTA final
- ATP Tour1 week ago
Matt Zemek used sloppy thinking and was exposed (but he still has a point)
- ATP Tour5 days ago
The Zverev verve versus the Zverev nerve